(Image credit: Getty Images)
Annuities are one of the most polarizing tools in personal finance. Some advisers swear by them, while others tell clients to avoid them entirely.
That divide raises a question: Are annuities inherently flawed, or simply misunderstood?
The truth sits somewhere in the middle.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
Annuities are complex products with real costs and real limitations, but they also serve legitimate purposes for certain investors. Understanding how they work — including the parts that often go undiscussed at the point of sale — can help investors make more informed decisions.
Main types of annuities
Not all annuities are created equal. Lumping them together is one of the main reasons they’re often misunderstood.
Fixed annuities offer a guaranteed interest rate over a set period, similar to a CD but often with higher yields. The main tradeoff is liquidity: Surrender periods typically last several years with meaningful early-withdrawal penalties, and the guarantee is backed by an insurance company rather than FDIC insurance.
Fixed index annuities (FIAs) earn interest based on the performance of market indexes, with downside protection on the index credit. Gains are typically capped or limited by participation rates, and the insurer can usually adjust those terms over the life of the contract. FIAs often include optional riders for income guarantees or enhanced death benefits, though these features come with additional costs.
Income annuities are designed to provide a steady stream of income, often for life. They can function like a personal pension, helping retirees address longevity risk. The main tradeoff is irreversibility: Once converted, the lump sum is generally no longer accessible.
Variable annuities allow investors to allocate funds into market subaccounts, offering higher growth potential alongside greater risk. They often include optional income or death-benefit riders, but combined annual costs can be substantial and create a meaningful drag on returns.
Each type serves a different purpose. The key is aligning the product with the investor’s goals, time horizon and tolerance for risk.
How to evaluate annuities
The most important question isn’t, “Is this good or bad?” but, “Is this appropriate for my situation, and have I understood the full cost?”
Liquidity, fees, and tax treatment all deserve attention. Most deferred annuities lock up money for years with steep early-withdrawal penalties. Gains are typically taxed as ordinary income rather than at capital gains rates, and heirs don’t receive a step-up in basis. Placing an annuity inside an IRA also doesn’t add tax deferral that isn’t already there.
It’s also worth comparing annuities with alternatives. A bond ladder, dividend portfolio or systematic withdrawal plan can sometimes achieve similar goals at lower cost. Because annuities are only as strong as the insurance company behind them, financial ratings and state guaranty coverage are worth checking.
Conflicts of interest in advice
Investors should be cautious of absolute positions on either side. “Never buy an annuity” and “you need this annuity” both deserve skepticism.
Advisory firms compensated through assets under management (AUM) charge ongoing fees on the assets they directly manage. Money moved into an annuity typically leaves that fee base, creating an incentive to keep assets in the portfolio even when an annuity might be appropriate.
On the other side, many annuities pay commissions to the adviser or agent who sells them, often paid upfront. This is one reason surrender charges exist — the insurer needs years of contract retention to recoup the commission.
An upfront commission creates a more direct and immediate incentive than an ongoing fee, and it’s often less visible to the client because it isn’t billed separately.
Neither conflict is automatically disqualifying, but they aren’t equivalent in size or structure. Transparency about how the person giving the advice is compensated — and what they would and wouldn’t earn under different recommendations — matters more than any general claim about the product category.
The right question isn’t whether annuities are universally good or bad, it’s whether a specific strategy fits a specific investor.
A balanced perspective
Annuities aren’t a silver bullet, and they’re not inherently flawed. They’re tools that can serve a purpose when used appropriately and at a fair cost.
For some investors, they provide stability and income that’s difficult to replicate through other means. For others, the costs and illiquidity make them unnecessary. The key is understanding what role, if any, they should play within a broader financial plan.
Taking the time to evaluate options, ask the right questions and seek transparent advice can make all the difference in determining whether an annuity belongs in your strategy.
