“I feel like we’ll never actually retire.”
“We make good money. But what retirement? It keeps moving further away.”
“I don’t want to abandon my kids. But I also don’t want to work until I’m 67 to make sure they’re OK.”
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
These aren’t quotes from struggling households. They’re what I hear regularly from Gen X professionals, dual-income earners in their late 40s and early 50s with real portfolios and real incomes.
They’re high earners with strong intentions — and a quiet but growing line item that almost none of them budgeted for: The Bank of Mom and Dad.
Picture this household: Both spouses are 49 with a combined income of $400,000 and an investment portfolio of $1.5 million. They want to retire at 60 to live on $175,000 a year in retirement, but feel as if they’ve finally earned the life they’ve been building.
Yet, $50,000 a year is quietly flowing out of that household to support two adult children, $25,000 each.
- One is 22, in her final year of college and living on campus but relying on her parents for tuition, a car, insurance and everyday expenses.
- The other is 27, recently engaged, living at home, needing help with a wedding and, eventually, a home down payment.
Neither child is a failure. Both parents are generous. But without a plan, that $50,000 is on its way to $70,000. In the 11 years before this couple wants to retire, that unstructured support will cost them far more than money.
People in these circumstances feel behind because they are. It’s not because they failed, but because no one helped them plan for this.
The situation is fixable, but only if it changes before the window closes.
The Gen X retirement squeeze is real and getting worse
Research by the Alliance Retirement Income Institute found that Gen X is the least financially prepared generation for retirement by nearly every measure. While Baby Boomers dominate the headlines, Generation X faces an even greater retirement crisis.
In 2025, the eldest Gen Xers entered their 60s, with multiple studies highlighting their lack of retirement preparedness, compounded by their status as a sandwich generation simultaneously caring for aging parents and supporting young adult children.
Meanwhile, roughly one in three adults ages 18 to 34 in the U.S. live with a parent, according to 2025 Census data, up slightly from the year before. A growing share aren’t just living at home; they’re financially dependent, sometimes deeply so.
For the theoretical household described above, the $50,000 in annual support isn’t the only problem. It’s what that number becomes. If support continues growing with life events, the wedding, the down payment, extended college costs, ongoing lifestyle needs, that figure reaches $70,000 per year with no defined exit point.
Over the 11 years before their target retirement at 60, unchecked support will have redirected hundreds of thousands of dollars that could have been compounding in retirement accounts, brokerage investments, and tax-advantaged savings.
That’s not a small gap. That’s a retirement.
One question before we run the numbers
I want to start where I start with every client, with a question I’ve asked clients for years: “Are you content with the financial and emotional investments you have placed into your adult children thus far?”
If the answer is yes, that doesn’t mean you continue indefinitely. It gives you permission to transition from guilt to intention, moving from reactive support to aligned support.
If the answer is no, that doesn’t mean you’ve failed. It means you have clarity.
This question is the foundation of my work on boomerang parenting and what it costs Gen X families, and I’ve explored it in depth in my Bank of Mom and Dad planning guide.
What I’ve found across thousands of conversations is that most parents aren’t irresponsible. They’re unresolved. They haven’t yet asked the question that turns support from a reflex into a plan.
What the numbers show
To fund $175,000 annually in retirement, using a 4% withdrawal rate as a planning baseline, this couple need about $4.375 million at age 60. They have $1.5 million today. That leaves a gap of roughly $2.875 million to build in 11 years, achievable with disciplined savings and compounding, but only if their dollars are pointed in the right direction.
Currently, $50,000 per year is flowing to adult children. If the 22-year-old transitions to financial independence after graduation but the 27-year-old’s needs continue to grow through wedding costs, a down payment, ongoing lifestyle support after marriage, that figure reaches $70,000 or more per year with no defined end.
Ameriprise Financial found that working parents contribute 2.3 times more to their adult children than to their own retirement accounts each month. For this household, that ratio is quietly becoming true.
Just as the structure of an adviser’s fee can quietly compound against retirement outcomes over time, so can unstructured household outflows. The Bank of Mom and Dad is one of the largest untracked line items in a Gen X financial plan.
The compounding cost of that drift is measurable. Here’s the planning illustration:
(Image credit: Preston Cherry)
That $510,000 to $625,000 difference is not a rounding error. It’s the gap between retiring at 60 and working until 63 or 64. It is the gap between retiring with confidence and retiring with the same anxiety that followed this household through its peak earning years.
“We don’t want to abandon them. We just don’t know how to stop.”
That’s a conversation worth having before the numbers get worse.
The catch-up window: Use it or lose it
What makes the next decade specifically critical for this Gen X household is that the tax code is actively rewarding people in their situation, if they act.
For 2026, participants in most 401(k), 403(b), governmental 457 plans and the federal government’s Thrift Savings Plan who are 50 and older can generally contribute up to $32,500 each year. That’s a $24,500 base contribution plus an $8,000 catch-up for those 50 and older.
The SECURE 2.0 Act introduced super catch-up contributions for those ages 60 to 63. For 2026, the super catch-up limit is $11,250, higher than the standard $8,000 catch-up available to those 50 and older, and designed to help those closest to retirement maximize their savings in the final stretch.
For a dual-income household, this is significant. If both spouses contribute maximally in their 50s and into their early 60s, the combined annual contribution capacity in employer-sponsored plans alone exceeds $65,000 per year, before IRA contributions and brokerage investments.
One note for high earners: Starting in 2026, if you earned more than $150,000 in FICA wages in the prior year, catch-up contributions in employer-sponsored plans must be made on a Roth after-tax, basis.
For a $400,000 dual-income household, this almost certainly applies. This isn’t a penalty. Roth contributions build tax-free retirement wealth, but it requires coordination with your plan and your adviser.
Every dollar redirected from unstructured adult-child support into catch-up contributions is a dollar that compounds tax-advantaged for 10 or more years and avoids taxation in retirement. For high earners in peak earning years, this is one of the most direct financial moves available.
The five-step plan for Gen X parents running the bank
Step 1: Get aligned with your spouse or partner first.
Before any conversation with your adult children, get aligned emotionally and financially with each other. Conflicting messages, one parent holding firm while the other quietly supplements, destroy planning integrity and create resentment in both directions.
This alignment conversation covers three questions:
- How much can we afford annually without compromising our retirement security?
- What are we willing to support?
- What’s the exit strategy?
Unity is not about being harsh. It’s about being honest with each other before you can be honest with your children.
Step 2: Audit the real numbers.
Many parents are genuinely surprised when they total what they’re spending on adult children annually. Housing, food, cellphone plans, car insurance, credit card transfers, tuition extensions, medical costs and emergency payments that recur like clockwork all add up to a real line item. For this example household, $50,000 is only the beginning of an honest audit.
Compare that number with current retirement contribution rates, brokerage account contributions, debt-reduction acceleration and lifestyle goals that have been postponed. Seeing trade-offs clearly, in actual dollars, removes guilt and restores agency.
Step 3: Distinguish between support types and set a timeline.
Not all support is equal. A 22-year-old in her final year of college has a clear exit point. A 27-year-old recently engaged and still living at home, needing wedding funds and a down payment, represents a much longer and more open-ended financial commitment if left unstructured.
Ask explicitly: Is this support a bridge or a baseline?
- Time-limited essentials cover final semester costs, a specific medical event or a relocation deposit. These have natural endpoints. Fund them clearly and close the chapter.
- Intra-life transfers are intentional gifts toward wealth-building milestones such as a home down payment or an emergency fund. These can be profoundly impactful and might carry more meaning than a post-death inheritance. They should be deliberate, budgeted and non-recurring.
- Lifestyle subsidies include ongoing rent, car payments, credit card transfers and recurring lifestyle support. These are the most consequential category because they rarely have a defined exit and tend to grow, not shrink, over time.
For the 27-year-old in this household, a one-time, clearly bounded contribution toward a wedding or down payment with a specific ceiling is fundamentally different from continuing open-ended household support into the couple’s first years of marriage. Define it now, before the number drifts.
Step 4: Redirect with intention.
If this household redirects $20,000 annually of unstructured support into retirement and after-tax accounts, starting in year three when the 22-year-old finishes college and becomes self-supporting, the compounding difference in the following eight years is substantial.
If both spouses max out 401(k) contributions including catch-up provisions starting at age 50, the annual retirement contribution capacity climbs well above $60,000 per year, enough to put the $4.375 million retirement target within reach.
An after-tax brokerage account deserves focused attention. Unlike retirement accounts, brokerage accounts provide liquidity before age 59½, flexible withdrawal options and the ability to fund retirement expenses from ages 60 to 72 before required minimum distributions begin. For a household targeting retirement at 60, this account isn’t optional; it’s essential.
Step 5: Have a compassionate, adult conversation.
The financial plan is only as effective as the conversation that introduces it.
With the 22-year-old, the conversation is relatively direct: There is a clear graduation date, and with graduation comes a transition to financial independence. You’re there for genuine emergencies, a health crisis or an unexpected job loss, not ongoing lifestyle support. This is not rejection; it’s the clearest expression of belief in her capability.
With the 27-year-old, the conversation requires more care. He’s newly engaged, wants to build a life, and has been living inside the support structure of his parents’ home. Be clear about what you can offer — perhaps a defined contribution toward a wedding or down payment with a specific amount and a specific end date — and equally clear that ongoing housing and lifestyle support has a sunset.
Frame it as preparation, not withdrawal. The boundaries you set today protect both your retirement and his long-term resilience.
Support without structure breeds resentment. Structure without compassion breeds distance. The goal is neither.
What intra-life transfers can do that inheritances can’t
The most meaningful financial gifts you can give your adult children might be the ones you give while they’re in their 20s and 30s, when a down payment helps them build equity for 30 years, or when early retirement account seeding gives compound growth decades to run.
In my experience, both parents and their adult children often say the same thing when this comes up: They would rather the money have meaning now, when it can change the trajectory of a young family’s life, than arrive later as part of an estate settlement.
The key is intentionality. An intra-life transfer that is bounded, purposeful and budgeted into your financial plan is fundamentally different from ongoing support that grows without definition or consent.
For the 27-year-old preparing to buy a home, a structured gift of $20,000 to $25,000 toward a down payment, planned, finite and clearly communicated, might do more lifetime good than a far larger sum left in an estate. It also carries more meaning to both the giver and the receiver when it’s given with intention rather than obligation.
Aligned generosity and aligned retirement savings are not in conflict. Your financial decisions should reflect how you actually want to live, not just how you feel in the moment.
