(Image credit: Getty Images)
For many high-income households, tax planning is not just about April 15. It is about how capital is positioned throughout the year.
Business owners, executives, physicians, attorneys and other high earners often face the same challenge: Strong income, limited deductions and a need to put capital to work in assets that may produce income and long-term value.
That is one reason direct energy investing can be attractive to accredited investors.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
Direct oil and gas investing is not new. The U.S. tax code has long recognized that domestic energy development is capital-intensive and comes with real risk. Drilling wells requires significant upfront capital before revenue is produced.
To support private capital in domestic energy development, certain tax incentives allow qualifying investors to claim deductions tied to the drilling and development of commercial oil and gas wells.
For accredited investors who take a thoughtful, long-term approach, direct energy investing can be appealing because it may offer current-year tax deductions, potential production income and possible long-term asset value.
Understanding intangible drilling costs
Direct oil and gas investing can create current-year deductions, including intangible drilling costs (IDCs) and tangible cost deductions through bonus depreciation.
IDCs are drilling costs that do not have salvage value. These can include labor, fuel, drilling services, well stimulation, hydraulic fracturing and other expenses needed to bring a commercial well into production.
Under current tax rules, IDCs may generally be deducted in the year they are paid or incurred. In the right circumstances, that can help accelerate deductions and reduce other taxable income.
A large part of a drilling budget is often made up of IDCs, but proper planning matters. Investors need to understand their own tax situation and make sure the investment is structured correctly.
Whether deductions are treated as active or passive depends on specific tax rules and how the investment is made.
Anyone considering direct energy investing as part of a tax strategy should work closely with their tax adviser and model the expected tax results before investing.
Tangible drilling costs and depreciation
Not all drilling costs are intangible. Some costs are tied to physical equipment and assets used in the well, such as casing, tubing, rods, wellhead equipment, pumping units, tanks, separators, flow lines and other tangible property.
When combined with IDC deductions, bonus depreciation can create a meaningful way to accelerate current-year deductions for commercial oil and gas drilling and development.
Depletion: Accounting for a diminishing asset
Oil and gas wells naturally decline over time. As oil and gas is produced, there is less remaining in the ground, which means the asset is being depleted.
The tax code recognizes that reality by allowing depletion deductions. In simple terms, depletion helps account for the reduction in remaining reserves as production occurs.
There are two common types of depletion:
- Cost depletion
- Percentage depletion
Generally, the taxpayer may use the greater of the two calculations.
Cost depletion is based on production compared to remaining recoverable reserves.
Percentage depletion is generally based on a percentage of gross production income, subject to certain limits.
In many cases, cost depletion may be higher during drilling and development years, while percentage depletion may be more useful in later years when the well is generating positive taxable production income.
This is one reason direct energy investing can appeal to high-income households, but it should always be evaluated as part of the full investment picture, not just for the tax treatment.
Why direct energy investing appeals to high-income households
For high-income households, the appeal is not simply “tax savings.” That framing is too narrow.
The real appeal is that direct energy investing may allow investors to align several goals at once.
Direct energy investing means participating in a real asset, typically an oil and gas working interest.
The main objectives are current-year tax deductions, potential production income and possible growth in the value of the underlying energy assets.
But tax benefits should never be the only reason to invest. The project itself has to make economic sense. Investors should look at the structure, business plan, operator, geology, drilling plan, costs, reserve potential, commodity price assumptions and exit strategy.
At King Operating Corporation, we focus on the full lifecycle of energy investing: Acquire, develop and divest. Our goal is to find opportunities where private capital can participate in oil and gas assets with a disciplined development plan.
The tax treatment matters, but it is only one part of the conversation. Asset quality, execution, operating strategy and alignment of interests matter just as much.
Direct investing vs public energy stocks
Many investors already have energy exposure through public stocks, mutual funds or ETFs. Those can offer liquidity and diversification, but they usually do not provide the same tax treatment that can come with direct participation in drilling and production.
Direct energy investing is different. It is less liquid, more specialized and generally available only to qualified or accredited investors. Because investors have indirect ownership tied to the underlying asset, the tax reporting and economics can look very different.
That difference can be valuable, but it requires education. Investors need to understand the risks, the expected holding period, how income is reported, when deductions may be available and what happens if wells underperform.
The risks should be clear
Direct oil and gas investing comes with real risk.
Wells may not produce as expected. Oil and gas prices can move quickly. Costs can rise. Regulations, operations and geology can all impact results. That is why smart tax planning and guidance from a qualified tax adviser matter.
Investors should be cautious of any opportunity that leads with tax benefits as the main reason to invest. Tax benefits can help improve the overall economics, but they do not remove the risk.
A responsible energy investment conversation should cover both sides: The upside and the risks.
For high-income households, direct energy investing can be a smart planning tool when it fits the bigger financial picture.
It gives investors potential access to domestic oil and gas production, production income, possible asset growth and tax benefits that are unique to the industry. But these advantages need to be used carefully, not rushed.
Before investing, talk with your tax adviser, financial adviser and legal counsel. The question should not just be, “How much can I deduct?” The better question is, “Does this investment make sense before and after taxes?”
When the answer is yes, direct energy investing can be a meaningful part of a high-income household’s portfolio.
