Close Menu
Money MechanicsMoney Mechanics
    What's Hot

    These Bose earbuds are an easy pick over AirPods for me – why I don’t regret it

    October 16, 2025

    LVMH, Other Luxury Companies Are Still Cashing In on the U.S. Market

    October 16, 2025

    Bunge Stock Soars as Trump Eyes China Cooking Oil Ban; Progressive Plunges

    October 16, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Trending
    • These Bose earbuds are an easy pick over AirPods for me – why I don’t regret it
    • LVMH, Other Luxury Companies Are Still Cashing In on the U.S. Market
    • Bunge Stock Soars as Trump Eyes China Cooking Oil Ban; Progressive Plunges
    • The Magic Number Your Savings Should Be Earning Right Now
    • Medicare Open Enrollment Starts Today. Here Are 4 Things You Need To Know
    • Fed’s Beige Book Report Finds A Stalled Job Market
    • A Major Bank Is Raising Its Monthly Fee—Here’s How to Avoid Paying More
    • Trade Uncertainty Sparks Whipsaw Session: Stock Market Today
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Money MechanicsMoney Mechanics
    • Home
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Crypto
      • Bonds
      • Commodities
    • Economy
      • Fed & Rates
      • Housing & Jobs
      • Inflation
    • Earnings
      • Banks
      • Energy
      • Healthcare
      • IPOs
      • Tech
    • Investing
      • ETFs
      • Long-Term
      • Options
    • Finance
      • Budgeting
      • Credit & Debt
      • Real Estate
      • Retirement
      • Taxes
    • Opinion
    • Guides
    • Tools
    • Resources
    Money MechanicsMoney Mechanics
    Home»Markets»Plunge protection, by Cathie Wood
    Markets

    Plunge protection, by Cathie Wood

    Money MechanicsBy Money MechanicsSeptember 19, 2025No Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Telegram Pinterest Tumblr Reddit WhatsApp Email
    Plunge protection, by Cathie Wood
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Theo Casey is CEO of EquityQuant.dev, co-founder of Marketcolor, and a veteran FT Alphaville contributor.

    At some point, the “it’s only newsworthy because Cathie Wood is doing it” bandwagon will run out of road. Today, however, is not that day.

    One of Wood’s recent ventures involves the favourite downside-protection derivatives strategy among ETF hipsters, the so-called buffer. ARK Invest applied to the SEC in July to create four defined outcome buffered ETFs referencing its Innovation ETF, one for each quarter, but has somehow spurned the opportunity to code them BARKK.

    Say hello, potentially, to ARK Defined Innovation ETF family: ARKI, ARKJ, ARKL and ARKM. Dated January-January, April-April, July-July and October-October, buffer-ARKKs will list in sequence and roll concurrently in one-year series. Each ETF will have a rolling 12-month outcome period and, while there’s no fund-of-funds structure, weighting the four series in a portfolio means one can be simulated. Each series expires and resets on its first birthday.

    The structure includes a 50 per cent downside cap provided by an at-the-money put, financed by an at-the-money call. For upside participation, a cheaper 5 per cent out-of-the-money call is bought with the remainder of the call premium. As with other buffers, b-ARKK will use FLEX options, non-standard contracts with customised terms sold over the counter, to avoid the headaches associated with assignment.

    This is a high-beta variant of the buffers we’ve seen to date. It relies on a greater than 5 per cent gain in any 12-month period, which for ARKK would have been a safe bet in recent years.

    Why now for a buffer-ARKK launch? It probably helps that defined outcome funds have been warmly received, with around $70bn net assets invested in downside-protecting exposures to the S&P, Russell, Nasdaq and others. Cboe this week announced a slated Q1 2026 launch of FLEX options in Europe, presumably paving the way for DAX, CAC and AEX buffers in the future. There is some anecdotal evidence to suggest investors buy and hold their buffers longer than they do funds without downside protection.

    What’s curious is the buffer-ARKK’s gap between downside protection and upside participation. What happens in a 12-month period where the portfolio bounces between 0 per cent and 5 per cent? Very little. The investor will have no losses, but also no returns.

    In our dataset starting January 2016, ARKK spent 175 of 1,745 trading up-days in the range between 0 and 5 per cent. On those days, an investor would be better served holding ARKK than buffer-ARKK.

    That said, we’ve modelled the hypothetical performance of buffer-ARKK against ARKK. And it’s not bad.

    Below you will see a Sigbox visualisation that simulates realised historical return distributions. The passage of time is rising, from the start of January 2020 at the bottom of the box to the end of June 2025 at the top. The parameters are arithmetic average return and realised volatility. (We call it a Sigbox because it looks like a signature in a box.)

    When the performance line is blue, ARKK should outperform buffer-ARKK. When the performance line is red, buffer-ARKK should outperform ARKK. The ghostly grey wall (black in static version) represents the equivalence curve where the funds perform about as well as each other on a risk-adjusted basis.

    Now follows a note to fellow quants. Normies are welcome to skip this bit.

    We took some liberties to visualise ARKK vs. buffer-ARKK, and what we might understand of its potential future. Sigbox is designed to give insightful analysis on ETFs, potential future ETFs and their derivative holdings. In this example, we use a dynamic model to capture the realised distribution of the underlying return from historical data. Then we calculate an equivalence curve to distinguish where ARKK and its comparator (ie. a composite of hypothetical Defined Innovation ARKK ETF series) have the same expected return. One can observe relative outperformance from a risk-return perspective over time. The simulation is *NOT* a comparative backtest using historical data. And of course, any start date at any time is itself a bias. Our bespoke model filters out some extreme features, such as Hurst statistics, which do not persist and could skew the long-term plot.

    Guessing the intended customer is what makes Ark’s run-of-the-mill N-1A filing so intriguing. Who asked for a high beta fund in a drawdown-protecting wrapper? To reiterate, buffer-ARKK limits losses to 50 per cent. If ARKK falls 72 per cent (as happened between 2021-2022, per the next chart), a hypothetical buffer-ARKK falls around 36 per cent. That’s a neat trick, but — with reference to AQR’s argument on buffers — why not just buy a low beta fund?

    Perhaps it’s another manifestation of Ark’s indefatigable brand equity. Maybe buffer-ARKK is the Diet Coke to ARKK’s full-fat original. Customers who should probably have a glass of water are happier when they put faith in a brand. They want Ark’s storied upside potential, but they might prefer a less gap-downy, less circuit-breakery, less left tail-risky version of that upside potential. And maybe investors will be willing to give up 5 per cent every 12 months to achieve such a defined outcome.

    Some content could not load. Check your internet connection or browser settings.

    When New York magazine published The Rise and Fall of Cathie Wood in 2022 (“to hear her talk was to feel your mind liquefy in a clickbait-like flood of dopamine-inducing buzzwords”) it may have been hard for many people to take her technobabble seriously. But Wood always had the aura and presentation more of a shepherd than a fund manager, and her flock cannot get enough of ARKK. With eight active ETFs, four crypto ETFs, one venture fund and two private funds, Ark has been happy to provide.

    ARKK led the active ETF revolution and today has puts and calls trading with ARKK as the reference asset. We might soon be adding buffer funds made up of FLEX-option equivalents of those American-style listed options on ARKK to the list of ARKK funds.

    What comes next? Levered, inverse and income ARKKs? No — because they already exist, courtesy of other ETF issuers. Tradr ETFs offers 2x long and inverse ARKK ETFs, and Leverage Shares has 3x long and inverse ARKK ETPs. YieldMax has a premium-selling income ARKK ETF.

    How many times can the industry envelop the same custom basket of stocks before notional presence is so huge it creates its own gravitational pull … or push. Even before buffers are added to the ranks, some may believe we are already there.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Telegram Email
    Previous ArticleWhat’s Going On With Jefferies Financial Stock Friday? – Jefferies Financial Gr (NYSE:JEF), Sumitomo Mitsui Finl Gr (NYSE:SMFG)
    Next Article I’m 55 With 10 Years Until Retirement and I’ve Made $2 Million on Nvidia Stock. What Do I Do With It Now?
    Money Mechanics
    • Website

    Related Posts

    Gold: Will Safe-Haven Demand Push Yellow Metal Even Higher?

    October 15, 2025

    3x leveraged fund goes to zero; investors lose everything

    October 15, 2025

    Winter residential energy expenditures vary by heating fuel

    October 15, 2025
    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    Top Posts

    These Bose earbuds are an easy pick over AirPods for me – why I don’t regret it

    October 16, 2025

    LVMH, Other Luxury Companies Are Still Cashing In on the U.S. Market

    October 16, 2025

    Bunge Stock Soars as Trump Eyes China Cooking Oil Ban; Progressive Plunges

    October 16, 2025

    The Magic Number Your Savings Should Be Earning Right Now

    October 16, 2025

    Subscribe to Updates

    Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
    Loading

    At Money Mechanics, we believe money shouldn’t be confusing. It should be empowering. Whether you’re buried in debt, cautious about investing, or simply overwhelmed by financial jargon—we’re here to guide you every step of the way.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube
    Links
    • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    Resources
    • Breaking News
    • Economy & Policy
    • Finance Tools
    • Fintech & Apps
    • Guides & How-To
    Get Informed

    Subscribe to Updates

    Please enable JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
    Loading
    Copyright© 2025 TheMoneyMechanics All Rights Reserved.
    • Breaking News
    • Economy & Policy
    • Finance Tools
    • Fintech & Apps
    • Guides & How-To

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.