Sean Bean as Ned Stark in Game of Thrones.
(Image credit: Alamy)
Retirement is rarely (OK, never) looked upon in the same light as an epic fantasy, where characters carry swords and shields to defend themselves from the fierce attack of warriors, giants and dragons.
But while watching A Knight of the Seven Kingdoms, the Game of Thrones spinoff, on HBO, it struck me that those swords and shields serve as an apt metaphor for retirement planning. Retirees need both swords and shields, figuratively speaking, if they hope to journey through retirement with minimal nicks and cuts to their portfolios.
Risk is the sword, allowing you to take the offensive and giving your portfolio the ability to grow.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
Cash and safer investments act as shields, offering protection to help you weather the onslaught of a volatile market.
If your retirement is to be successful, you will want both sword and shield at the ready.
Wielding the sword for higher returns
The sword (risk) is the more dramatic tool in your arsenal, so let’s start there.
That isn’t the case as you are near or enter retirement. A major market setback at that point is difficult to overcome because time is not on your side. Also, you may be drawing on your investments to cover expenses in retirement, and that combination of market losses and money spent can drain your portfolio quickly.
The prudent thing to do at this stage is to reduce your risk so less of your money is subject to market volatility. If someone who is 65 has all of their money at risk, that tells me they aren’t ready for the battle that’s coming.
But it’s also not wise to eliminate all of your risk because you do want some of your money to grow. This is because, too often, some safer investments struggle to keep up with inflation, so your money’s spending power is barely growing — if it’s growing at all.
Inflation is a major risk for retirees. We know that, fairly recently, inflation shot up to some of the highest rates in years, and that could happen again. Investing a portion of your portfolio in stocks — even though there is risk — is necessary to try to counter the effects of inflation.
But what percentage of your portfolio should be at risk?
Sadly, there is no easy answer, though for many people the correct response to that question might fall somewhere in the 30% to 40% range. But individual cases will vary depending on someone’s age, tolerance for risk, income needs and other factors.
One thing I do recommend is having a longer timeline for your risk money. This should be long-term money you don’t expect to use for 10 to 20 years. Your cash and safer investments are there for more immediate needs. They are your short-term and medium-term money.
Raising the shield to protect the portfolio
Now that your sword has its assignment, it’s time to think about the shield.
Ideally, you will want some money that’s immediately available to you to handle routine living expenses as well as emergencies, such as an expensive car repair or a hospital bill.
Then you will want to place a certain amount in those safer investments. With these, you can’t expect the kind of gains possible with those aggressive investments that have greater risk attached to them. But you also won’t face the potentially devastating losses that can come with a high level of risk.
One example of safe money accounts is certificates of deposit, although their returns tend to be low, so you wouldn’t want to park a large share of your money here. Other examples are fixed index annuities, buffered ETFs and structured notes.
A partner for the coming battles
Once you have your money in place — some at risk, some in safer investments and some in cash — the temptation may be to leave things as they are permanently.
That would also be a mistake.
That way, you, your sword and your shield aren’t going into battle alone.
Ronnie Blair contributed to this article.
The appearances in Kiplinger were obtained through a PR program. The columnist received assistance from a public relations firm in preparing this piece for submission to Kiplinger.com. Kiplinger was not compensated in any way.
