Follow ZDNET: Add us as a preferred source on Google.
ZDNET’s key takeaways
- Samsung offers stronger software support and ecosystem perks.
- Motorola stands out for value, design, and battery life.
- The best Android brand depends on your budget and priorities.
Samsung and Motorola are two of the oldest and most innovative brands in the mobile phone space. In recent years, one has pushed boundaries with the first-ever book-style foldable phone, while the other has reinvented the flip phone. Both brands offer phones at a variety of price points. You can get a Samsung Galaxy or a Motorola phone for less than $250 to more than $1,800.
Also: Why I recommend this $450 Samsung phone over competing models by Google and OnePlus
I have reviewed most of these phones from both Samsung and Motorola and liked them for different reasons. But their wide portfolios and competitive nature can be confusing if you’re in the market for a new device.
Here’s how they compare in 2026, and which brand better suits your needs.
You should buy a Samsung Galaxy phone if…
You want a better ecosystem of devices
If you already have a Samsung product or want to purchase another device from Samsung, a Galaxy phone would pair better with those products. Samsung has a broader product ecosystem than Motorola. From appliances like refrigerators and air conditioners to laptops, TVs, and tablets, there’s more to Samsung than just phones. For any cross-device functionality, having a Samsung TV, laptop, and phone can make your life easier with deeply integrated ecosystem features.
Also: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 vs. Pixel 10 Pro Fold vs. Motorola Razr Fold – this model wins for me
For example, you can control your Samsung TV using the SmartThings app on your Galaxy smartphone. It’s the simple things, like not needing to look for the remote every time you want to change the volume or mess around with other TV settings.
You also get Apple ecosystem-like features, where the Samsung Galaxy Buds work best when paired with a Galaxy smartphone, and App Continuity allows you to continue browsing the same website across your phone and tablet.
Motorola makes other products, too, but they aren’t as deeply integrated with the Razr phones as Samsung’s Galaxy ecosystem.
You need longer software support
Google’s recent dynamic with Samsung has helped the brand promise Pixel-level software commitment with its recent phones. The two brands have collaborated on several Android features, and it has benefited the new generation of Galaxy phones.
Also: I’ve used every Samsung Galaxy S26 model – here’s why the Ultra is frustratingly the best
From a $450 Galaxy A37 5G to the $1,900 Galaxy Z Fold 7, you’ll get at least six years of software support with every phone. This extends to seven years of Android OS and security updates on more premium devices like the Galaxy S series and Galaxy Z lineup. This puts it on par with Google Pixel’s industry-leading Android software update policy.
Motorola, on the other hand, pushed to seven years of software support this year with the Motorola Signature and Razr Fold devices. However, the lower-end phones and the Razr 2026 series of flip phones are still stuck with a three-year Android upgrade promise.
If you’re investing $800 in a new phone, and you want it to last more than three years, a Samsung Galaxy device is your best bet.
You need aggressive carrier promotions
Samsung Galaxy phones usually get better carrier promotions than Motorola smartphones. The promotions are so aggressive that a price hike on the Galaxy S26 series was accompanied by stronger carrier promotions.
Also: Own a Samsung phone? I changed 10 settings to greatly improve its performance
According to a Counterpoint Research report, “US carriers responded to the memory crunch-induced price hikes with stronger promotions” and “all three [Galaxy S26] models and carriers saw substantial increases in the highest tier promotions.” This results in more tempting offers for new-generation Samsung Galaxy phones than Motorola devices.
You should buy a Motorola phone if…
You want better value for money
Motorola is unbeatable in the affordable segment. It is the only manufacturer that offers a stylus-equipped phone for $500 (after a recent $100 price hike) and a battery-focused device for $300. Samsung doesn’t have that wide range of features in the midrange and lower end of the market. If you want a budget device, a Motorola phone will serve you better than a Galaxy phone.
Also: I’ve tested every Razr and Galaxy Flip: 3 reasons Motorola crushes Samsung at foldables
Moreover, you can get a previous-generation Razr flip phone for less than $500 (or even $400 at times). You don’t need to spend upward of $500 to get the novelty of a flip phone. For any first-time foldable phone buyer who doesn’t want to drop $1,000 on a new device, the Motorola Razr lineup is more accessible than a Samsung Galaxy Z series flip phone.
You want more creative designs
Motorola experiments with color and material finishes that other brands don’t even touch.
From Pantone color partnerships to FIFA World Cup edition devices, you can find a Razr phone with appealing color combos as well as faux leather finishes. Heck, there’s a Brilliant lineup of Motorola phones with Swarovski stones on them! Samsung doesn’t have that range when it comes to special-edition phones in the US.
Also: Google Pixel vs. Samsung Galaxy: I’ve tested both brands extensively, and there’s a clear winner
I love it when my phone looks different and has more personality and character in its design. And if you are like me, too, a Motorola Edge or Razr series phone is your device to pick over its Samsung rival.
You need better battery life
Motorola is the first manufacturer in the US to put a silicon-carbon battery on its foldable. This technology allows phone manufacturers to add more battery capacity in slimmer designs without adding more bulk to a phone.
As a result, the new Motorola Razr Fold is the only foldable in the US to have a 6,000mAh battery — in a build that weighs considerably less than the Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold. While the Galaxy Z Fold 7 remains unbeatable in its design, the 4,400mAh battery might not be enough for heavy phone users.
Also: Motorola Razr Fold review
This gap isn’t as wide in the sub-$600 category, where you can get a slim, light Galaxy A57 5G with 5,000mAh. However, if you are on a budget, the Motorola G Power series will be more attractive than any other rival under $300, thanks to its 5,200mAh battery.
Writer’s choice
I love certain aspects of Motorola’s UI, like pressing and holding on the Always on Display to check notifications, but I like Samsung’s cohesiveness more. Motorola pushes ahead in the budget segment with a clean UI and a wide feature set, but for flagship phones, I still prefer Samsung Galaxy devices for their long software support, premium build, and more reliable cameras.
