(Image credit: Getty Images)
For decades, bonds have played a familiar role in retirement portfolios. They are meant to reduce volatility, provide income and act as a counterbalance to stocks, especially as investors approach and enter retirement.
But with the Federal Reserve signaling more potential rate cuts ahead, many investors are facing a key decision: How best to allocate the portion of a portfolio traditionally reserved for bonds.
One option worth understanding is the fixed indexed annuity.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
The challenge facing traditional fixed income
Today’s bond investors are confronting a very different environment than they were just a few years ago. After a period of elevated interest rates, yields on high-quality bonds are attractive compared with much of the past decade.
At the same time, the prospect of future rate cuts suggests that yields may compress, which can weigh on fixed income returns.
This dynamic has raised questions about whether traditional fixed income, by itself, will deliver the combined income, stability and return many retirees expect, especially over the long haul.
It has also prompted financial advisers to consider how other alternatives might complement or enhance the bond portion of a portfolio.
What a fixed indexed annuity does
A fixed indexed annuity (FIA) is an insurance contract designed to provide principal protection while offering the potential for growth tied to a market index, such as the S&P 500 price index.
Unlike direct market investments, FIAs do not participate in market losses. When the linked index posts a loss, the annuity’s contract value does not decline because of market performance.
In exchange for this protection, growth is typically limited by caps, participation rates or spreads, and dividends are not included in index calculations. The result is a return profile that is intentionally smoother than equities and can be more competitive than traditional fixed income in certain rate and volatility regimes.
In simple terms, an FIA seeks to do what many investors want bonds to do: Limit downside risk while still providing reasonable upside potential.
What the research says
Academic research supports the idea of diversification beyond traditional stocks and bonds to improve risk-adjusted outcomes.
Pioneering work by Roger Ibbotson, professor of Finance at the Yale School of Management and founder of Ibbotson Associates, has shown that investors are rewarded for exposure to multiple risk premiums and that combining assets with different risk and return characteristics can enhance portfolio outcomes over time.
In research examining long-term market data from 1927 through 2016, Ibbotson and his colleagues found that a simulated FIA tied to a large-cap equity index produced bond-like volatility while delivering a higher annualized return than long-term government bonds, with zero negative rolling three-year periods.
That combination of downside protection and competitive long-term return aligns closely with the role many investors expect bonds to play in retirement portfolios.
Indexed strategies that blend principal protection with participation in equity returns can therefore occupy a middle ground, dampening downside risk while still capturing a portion of market upside.
By combining assets with imperfect correlations, diversified portfolios have historically demonstrated improved risk-adjusted performance, particularly during periods of market stress.
Why timing matters right now
FIAs are sensitive to interest rates in a different way than bonds. Higher interest rates generally allow insurance companies to offer more attractive crediting terms. As rates decline, those terms tend to become less favorable for new contracts.
That means today’s environment, before rates potentially move lower, may be an advantageous time to evaluate whether an FIA makes sense for part of a portfolio. Much like locking in attractive bond yields, an FIA allows investors to lock in contract terms that may not be available in the future.
This does not mean abandoning bonds entirely. Instead, it may mean reconsidering whether all of the traditional bond allocation truly needs to be limited to conventional fixed income.
FIAs as a bond complement, not a replacement
FIAs are not designed to replace equities, and they are not suitable for short-term money. They are long-term tools intended for retirement-focused capital. For the right investor, however, FIAs can complement bonds by:
- Reducing portfolio volatility
- Providing downside protection during market declines
- Offering tax-deferred growth
- Helping mitigate sequence-of-returns risk near retirement
When structured properly and matched to an investor’s goals and time horizon, FIAs can serve as a stabilizing element in a diversified retirement portfolio, helping to balance growth potential with downside risk control.
The bottom line
FIAs are not one-size-fits-all. Liquidity needs, tax considerations, time horizon and overall portfolio construction all matter.
In an environment where bond yields may compress and rate expectations are evolving, it may be time to revisit old assumptions. A traditional 60/40 portfolio worked well for decades, but the coming years may require a more flexible approach.
For investors nearing retirement who value stability, predictability and protection, fixed indexed annuities deserve thoughtful consideration as part of the broader discussion.
As with any financial strategy, it is important to evaluate how FIAs fit within your overall approach and to work with a qualified financial professional before making investment decisions.
