Video calls are exhausting. You’re juggling screen sharing, managing participants, and dealing with spotty connections. The last thing you need is headache-inducing software.
Zoom became very popular during the pandemic, but it’s not your only option for video conferencing. Google Meet integrates seamlessly with your calendar. Microsoft Teams works better for enterprises. Platforms like Whereby require zero downloads. I’ve tested these platforms many times over my career, reviewing B2B software, watching them evolve with each major update. Some got better, others stayed stagnant, and a few surprised me with features that genuinely improved my workday.
Get more in-depth ZDNET tech coverage: Add us as a preferred Google source on Chrome and Chromium browsers.
What is the best Zoom alternative right now?
Google Meet takes the top spot for most teams. The platform supports up to 100 participants free and works directly in your browser. I particularly appreciate how it automatically pulls meeting details from Gmail and Calendar. No more copying links between apps.
Also: The best business messaging apps
The best Zoom alternatives of 2026
Show less
ZDNET
Google Meet has become my default recommendation for most teams, especially those already using Google Workspace. The free tier generously supports up to 100 participants, and everything runs smoothly in your browser without downloads. I found the automatic integration with Gmail and Calendar fully eliminates the constant back-and-forth of scheduling, which is a relief.
The video and audio quality consistently impressed me during testing. Google’s noise-cancelation filters out background sounds without making voices sound robotic. This matters when you’re on calls from coffee shops or busy homes. The platform now includes AI-powered features through Gemini integration on paid plans, offering meeting summaries and smart recaps that actually save time during follow-ups.
Also: This Google Meet tool could help you look better in meetings – even the early ones
Paid plans start at $6 per user monthly through Google Workspace Business Starter. This tier removes the 60-minute time limit and adds intelligent noise-cancelation plus dial-in numbers. The Business Standard plan at $12 monthly includes meeting recording saved directly to Google Drive, breakout rooms, and polling features that make interactive sessions much easier to manage.
The interface stays deliberately simple. Beginners appreciate this, but power users might find it limiting. You won’t get the extensive customization options that platforms like Zoom offer, but most teams don’t actually need those features anyway.
Google Meet features: Up to 500 participants | Meeting recording | Breakout rooms | Live captions | Noise cancellation | Screen sharing | Virtual backgrounds
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
Show less
Microsoft
Microsoft Teams dominates in enterprise environments for good reason. The platform handles everything from quick video calls to massive company-wide broadcasts, with participant limits reaching 10,000 attendees on enterprise plans. I tested Teams multiple times over the last few years. The integration with Outlook, Word, Excel, and SharePoint creates a truly unified workspace with no context switching.
Security features justify the higher price tag for regulated industries. Teams includes end-to-end encryption, advanced compliance tools through Microsoft Purview, and granular administrative controls that IT departments actually need. The platform’s Together Mode creates an interesting shared virtual space that makes larger meetings feel more engaging than traditional grid layouts.
Also: Microsoft Copilot is taking over Teams. Here’s how AI will shape your daily workflow
Pricing starts at $4 per user monthly for Teams Essentials, which includes unlimited meetings up to 30 hours and 300 participants. Most businesses opt for Microsoft 365 Business Standard at $12.50 monthly, bundling Teams with desktop Office apps and 1TB cloud storage. The Business Premium plan costs $22 monthly and adds advanced security features including Microsoft Defender and endpoint management.
The main drawback that hits new users is that Teams packs so many features that the interface feels cluttered. You’ll need time to learn where everything lives. This makes it less ideal for occasional users or external collaborators who just need simple video calls.
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
Show less
Zoho
Zoho Meeting delivers remarkable value for budget-conscious businesses. The platform starts at just $1 per host monthly when billed annually, supporting 10 participants with essential features including screen sharing and recording. This pricing undercuts nearly every competitor while maintaining solid core functionality that actually works.
The interface strikes a nice balance between simplicity and capability. You won’t find advanced features like AI noise cancellation or fancy virtual backgrounds. But everything you need for professional meetings exists in easy-to-find locations. Teams already using other Zoho products benefit from excellent integration with Zoho CRM, Projects, and Calendar. But connections to non-Zoho tools remain sadly limited.
Video and audio quality generally performs well, though I’ve noticed occasional blurriness during bandwidth-constrained calls with larger groups. The platform includes separate editions for meetings and webinars, with webinar pricing starting at $7.50 monthly for 25 attendees. Recording capabilities and cloud storage come standard on paid plans, with recordings saved in the Zoho ecosystem for easy access.
Again, the biggest limitation affects companies that rely heavily on third-party integrations. While Zoho Meeting connects smoothly with other Zoho products, you’ll struggle to build complex workflows with external tools that platforms like Google Meet or Teams handle effortlessly.
Zoho Meeting features: Up to 250 participants | Screen sharing | Meeting recording | Webinar mode | Polls and Q&A | Calendar integration | Mobile apps
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
Show less
Jitsi
Jitsi is the premier open-source video conferencing platform for privacy-conscious organizations. Anyone can use the free public instance at meet.jit.si without creating accounts or installing software: Just share a link and start talking. The platform supports unlimited participants theoretically, though performance depends entirely on your server specifications when self-hosting.
Organizations wanting complete data control can deploy Jitsi on their own infrastructure. The setup process requires technical knowledge. It runs best on Ubuntu with proper configuration of components like Jitsi Videobridge and Jibri for recording. However, this gives you something valuable that commercial platforms can’t offer. You get absolute certainty that your meeting data stays on servers you control.
The platform implements end-to-end encryption and doesn’t collect user data, making it ideal for healthcare, legal, and government organizations with strict privacy requirements. Integration options include SIP support for traditional phone systems and APIs for embedding into custom applications. The active open-source community regularly contributes improvements and maintains extensive documentation.
I can say from experience that self-hosting demands ongoing maintenance and technical expertise. You’ll need someone who can handle server management, troubleshoot connectivity issues, and keep everything updated. For teams without dedicated IT resources, the free public instance works fine for basic needs but offers no guarantees around uptime or support.
Jitsi features: Unlimited participants | Screen sharing | Recording | End-to-end encryption | No downloads needed | Custom branding | SIP integration
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
Show less
Screenshot by Ritoban Mukherjee/ZDNET
Whereby wins on pure simplicity. You get a permanent room URL that works every single time. No generating new links, no scheduling interfaces, no confusion about where to click. I like how participants join instantly through their browsers without downloads, registrations, or technical friction that typically derails client meetings.
The free plan supports one host and up to 100 participants in a single room, perfect for consultants, therapists, or small business owners running regular client calls. Paid plans start at $9 monthly for the Pro tier, adding recording capabilities and removing the Whereby branding. The Business plan at $12 per host monthly supports up to 200 participants with custom branding and priority support.
Video and audio quality remain consistently reliable even on slower connections, though Whereby lacks the advanced noise cancellation found in Google Meet or Teams. The platform includes useful features like breakout rooms, virtual backgrounds, and waiting room controls that give hosts appropriate management capabilities without complexity.
Whereby deliberately keeps things minimal. That means missing features that power users expect. You won’t find extensive analytics, advanced security controls, or deep integrations with business tools. The platform works beautifully for straightforward video calls but struggles when you need sophisticated meeting management or enterprise-grade capabilities.
Whereby features: Up to 200 participants | Screen sharing | Breakout rooms | Virtual backgrounds | Recording | Custom branding | Waiting room
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
|
Platform |
Starting cost |
Customizable? |
Integrations |
Easy to use? |
|
Google Meet |
Free (up to $22 per user per month) |
Limited options |
Extensive – Google Workspace, Calendar, Gmail |
Yes – intuitive interface |
|
Microsoft Teams |
$4 per user per month |
Highly customizable |
Extensive – Office 365, SharePoint, over 1,000 apps |
Requires training – complex interface |
|
Zoho Meeting |
$1 per host per month |
Basic customization |
Limited – mainly Zoho products |
Yes – straightforward setup |
|
Jitsi |
Free (self-hosted) |
Fully customizable open-source |
Moderate – SIP, APIs available |
Requires training – setup needs technical skills |
|
Whereby |
Free (up to $12 per host per month) |
Basic branding options |
Limited – Miro, Trello, Google Drive |
Yes – extremely simple |
|
Choose this platform… |
If you want or need… |
|
Google Meet |
Seamless integration with Gmail and Google Calendar without installation hassles. Perfect for teams already using Google Workspace who want video calls that just work. |
|
Microsoft Teams |
Enterprise-grade security and collaboration tools with deep Office 365 integration. Best for larger organizations needing advanced compliance features and unified communications. |
|
Zoho Meeting |
Maximum value for your budget without sacrificing core functionality. Ideal for small businesses and Zoho ecosystem users prioritizing cost savings over extensive integrations. |
|
Jitsi |
Complete control over your meeting data with open-source flexibility. Perfect for privacy-focused organizations with technical resources to self-host and maintain their own infrastructure. |
|
Whereby |
The absolute simplest video conferencing experience with permanent room links. Great for consultants, therapists, and service providers who want clients to join instantly without technical friction. |
Selecting the right video conferencing platform requires looking beyond headline features. You need to understand how it fits your specific workflow. Here are the key factors that actually matter in daily use:
-
Integration capabilities: Your video platform needs to connect smoothly with existing tools. Google Meet excels for Gmail users. Teams dominates in Microsoft environments. Zoho Meeting works best within the Zoho ecosystem. Consider which calendar system you use, where you store files, and which CRM or project management tools your team relies on daily.
-
Participant limits and pricing structure: Free tiers vary dramatically in their restrictions. Google Meet caps free meetings at 60 minutes for groups. Whereby limits participants but allows longer sessions. Calculate your typical meeting size and frequency to avoid hitting artificial limits or paying for capacity you don’t need.
-
Setup friction for external participants: Platforms requiring downloads or account creation create barriers that derail client meetings. Whereby and Google Meet work directly in browsers. This makes them ideal when working with external stakeholders who resist installing software. Consider how tech-savvy your typical participants are and whether they’ll tolerate setup steps.
-
Security and compliance requirements: Healthcare, legal, and financial organizations need platforms meeting specific regulatory standards. Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-grade compliance tools. Jitsi provides complete data control through self-hosting. Review your industry’s requirements before committing to any platform.
-
Recording and transcript capabilities: Many platforms lock recording behind paid tiers or limit storage. Google Meet saves recordings to Drive on paid plans. Teams includes transcription. Whereby adds recording at the Pro level. Determine whether you need recordings for compliance, training, or reference purposes.
-
Mobile experience quality: Teams on the go need apps that actually work well on phones and tablets. Test the mobile versions thoroughly if you have field staff or frequently join meetings away from your desk. Some platforms prioritize desktop experiences while neglecting mobile functionality.
-
Technical support availability: Free tiers often lack responsive support when things break. Consider whether you can troubleshoot issues yourself or need guaranteed response times. Enterprise plans from Microsoft and Google include priority support that matters when critical meetings hang in the balance.
I’ve been reviewing B2B software for over eight years now. I’ve tested each video conferencing platform dozens of times as they roll out updates. So, I know which platforms have improved dramatically and which ones keep making the same mistakes. This experience helps me distinguish between genuinely useful features and marketing fluff.
I evaluated these platforms through hands-on testing that mimics real-world use rather than controlled demos. Each platform was tested across different scenarios — quick one-on-one calls, team meetings with screen sharing, and larger presentations with audience participation. I paid special attention to setup friction because that’s where most platforms lose users. I timed how long it takes from initial signup to actually starting a productive meeting.
Video and audio quality matter more than feature lists. I tested each platform under various network conditions and with different numbers of participants.
Meeting participants can join Google Meet calls through shared links without accounts on paid plans. However, hosting meetings requires a Google account. The free tier lets anyone with a Google account create meetings supporting up to 100 participants for 60 minutes.
All platforms reviewed offer mobile apps for iOS and Android. Google Meet and Microsoft Teams provide full-featured mobile experiences with most desktop capabilities. Whereby works directly in mobile browsers without requiring app downloads, though the dedicated app offers better performance. Jitsi includes mobile apps, but the experience varies depending on whether you’re using the public instance or self-hosted deployment.
Security levels vary significantly. Microsoft Teams offers enterprise-grade security features including advanced compliance tools and endpoint management. Jitsi provides complete data control through self-hosting with end-to-end encryption. Google Meet includes solid security appropriate for most business use. Each platform has addressed the security concerns that plagued early video conferencing, but regulated industries should carefully review specific compliance requirements.
Recording capabilities remain locked behind paid tiers on most platforms. Google Meet requires Business Standard or higher for recording. Microsoft Teams includes recording on paid plans starting with Essentials. Zoho Meeting adds recording on paid tiers. Whereby offers recording with Pro plans and above. Jitsi supports recording when self-hosted with proper Jibri configuration, but the free public instance doesn’t include this feature.
Other Zoom alternatives to consider
Show less
Screenshot via ZDNET
Business-oriented video conferencing with reliable performance and easy screen sharing, priced competitively for small to mid-sized organizations needing straightforward meeting tools.
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less
Show less
Screenshot via ZDNET
Lightweight audio-first meetings with optional video built directly into Slack channels and DMs, perfect for teams already using Slack who want spontaneous conversations without leaving their collaboration platform.
Read More
Show Expert Take Show less

