(Image credit: Getty Images)
I grew up in a small town in western Oklahoma, the youngest of three kids, raised by a single mom. We were poor. Really poor for a stretch. No car. No house. For a little while, we even lived in a tent.
But as a little kid, I didn’t process that as trauma. I just remember riding in a red wagon while my mom took my brother and sister to school. I thought it was fun.
Then my mom did something remarkable. While raising three kids and working full time, she earned her master’s degree. She got her dream job.
Sign up for Kiplinger’s Free Newsletters
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice on investing, taxes, retirement, personal finance and more – straight to your e-mail.
Profit and prosper with the best of expert advice – straight to your e-mail.
We moved into our first real home — a tiny white shotgun house near a church. Two bedrooms, one bath, around 700 square feet. It was a small place, but to us, it felt like we’d finally made it.
A few years later, I came home and found my mom on the couch crying. She’d been laid off that day.
Ironically, that was the first time I felt financial fear in my bones. Are we going to lose the house? Are we going to be OK? That moment never left me. It still drives how I help people today.
I find that many folks think retirement risk is mostly market risk. Markets do matter. But in my experience, the bigger risk is fragility: A plan that works only if nothing goes wrong.
If one market drop, one tax surprise or one health event can force you into deciding between bad and worse, the plan is probably too brittle.
I say this all the time in workshops: At any stage of life, and especially in retirement, it’s not just about what you bring in. It’s about what you keep and whether your plan can keep you standing when life brings a test.
Here are the three questions every retirement plan should answer clearly.
- If (and when) markets drop, can we still pay bills without panic selling?
- Are future taxes quietly shrinking our choices?
- Do our income, investments, taxes, health care and legacy decisions actually work together?
If those answers are fuzzy, you don’t have a planning problem. You have a planning opportunity. Fear loses its edge when you already know how you’d address whatever could happen. Diffusing that fear starts with helping protect your cash flow.
Here’s how to approach each question:
1. Cash flow resilience: Can you cover bills without selling when times are bad?
In retirement, the first job of the plan isn’t chasing returns. It’s making sure the lights stay on. I demonstrate this with three buckets: Safety, income and growth.
The safety bucket is your stability money. This is where short-term spending and reserves live, so you don’t feel forced to sell long-term investments in a down market.
The income bucket is for dependable cash flow, things like Social Security, pensions and other reliable income sources that help cover monthly essentials.
The growth bucket is long-horizon money. It’s there because inflation doesn’t retire when you do, and your plan still has to grow over time.
Here’s a quick stress test: Say a household needs $8,000 a month, and their reliable income stream covers $5,000. That leaves a $3,000 gap. If the market drops hard and stays down for 18 months, can that gap be covered without selling growth assets at a discount?
If the answer is no, that’s not an investment failure. It’s a cash flow design issue.
Action step this week: Split spending into “essential” and “flexible.” Then calculate how many months of essential expenses you can cover without selling growth assets. If you can’t bridge 12 to 24 months, your plan may benefit from more shock absorbers.
Returns matter. But resilience comes first.
2. Tax shock control: Are you defusing the future tax bomb?
The second fragility point is taxes people haven’t thought through yet.
Many retirees did exactly what they were told for years: Save consistently in tax-deferred accounts. That discipline is good. But those balances are pre-tax dollars. The statement balance isn’t always what you actually keep.
It’s common for people to get hurt waiting too long to coordinate withdrawals. Required distributions, Social Security taxation and Medicare premium impacts can stack up in ways that squeeze flexibility later.
That’s why I’m big on proactive tax windows. Some years, income is temporarily lower. Those can be opportunities to reposition money intentionally — including measured Roth conversions — rather than being cornered by larger taxable withdrawals later.
You don’t need a complicated strategy to improve outcomes. You need a forward-looking map and a team that talks to each other.
Action step this week: With your adviser and CPA, map the next five years of planned income sources: Taxable, tax-deferred and tax-free. Then ask, “Which years give us our best tax window, and what should we do while it’s open?”
A plan that ignores future tax pressure can look fine on paper and still feel restrictive in real life.
3. Coordination over accounts: Do all five planning areas talk to each other?
This is the gap I see most often: People have accounts, products and documents. But they don’t have coordination.
You might have a portfolio manager, a tax preparer, insurance policies and estate documents. If each piece is handled in a silo, one “good” decision can quietly create a new problem somewhere else.
That’s why our framework works to coordinate five areas: Income planning, investments, tax strategy, health care and legacy.
In real life, decisions overlap. A withdrawal choice can affect taxes, Medicare premiums, sequence risk and what you leave behind. Claiming strategies, one-time expenses and gifting decisions all carry cross-effects, too.
When those areas are coordinated, people make fewer reactive moves. They feel less boxed in. They make better decisions because they can finally see how the pieces fit.
Action step this week: Make a one-page household map with five rows: Income, investments, tax strategy, health care and legacy.
For each row, list your current strategy, biggest risk and who is accountable. If nobody can explain how all five rows connect, coordination is missing.
One-page household stress test
Want to pressure-test your plan in 15 minutes? Start here:
- What are our essential monthly expenses?
- How much of that is covered by reliable income right now?
- How many months can we fund essentials without selling growth assets?
- What’s our withdrawal order, and why?
- Where is our biggest future tax exposure?
- What is our plan for a major health event or long-term care shock?
- Do beneficiary designations and estate documents still match current goals?
- Who is coordinating income, investments, tax strategy, health care and legacy in one integrated plan?
If those answers aren’t easy to find, the issue usually isn’t effort. It’s structure.
Final thoughts
I can still picture my mom on that couch, trying to hold it together after a layoff she never saw coming. That memory shaped my definition of a good retirement plan.
Retirement isn’t just about how much you made. It’s about whether your plan keeps you standing when life throws a punch.
If your current plan can’t answer the stress-test questions on one page, you don’t necessarily need more products. It’s probably time for better coordination and clearer leadership.
Sit down with an experienced adviser — not just experienced in finance, but in life, too — and your CPA, and build a plan designed to protect your footing, not just project a return.
I can tell you with my whole heart, it’s the reason I’m standing tall today.
